Ham vs Lamb
· Source: USDA FoodData Central
Nutrition Comparison per 100g
Meat vs Meat
Side-by-Side Nutrition Facts
Macronutrient Breakdown
Ham
Lamb
Nutrition Quick Facts (per 100g)
Ham
- Calories145 kcal
- Protein21g
- Total Fat5.5g
- Carbohydrates1.5g
- Dietary Fiber0g
- Sugar0g
- Vitamin C0mg
- Calcium7mg
- Iron0.7mg
- Potassium287mg
Lamb
- Calories282 kcal
- Protein16.6g
- Total Fat23.4g
- Carbohydrates0g
- Dietary Fiber0g
- Sugar0g
- Vitamin C0mg
- Calcium16mg
- Iron1.6mg
- Potassium222mg
About This Data
Nutrition data is sourced from the USDA FoodData Central SR Legacy database, the authoritative reference for nutrient composition of foods sold and consumed in the United States. All values are per 100g of the raw food item unless otherwise noted.
Actual nutritional content may vary based on preparation method (raw vs. cooked, boiled vs. fried), agricultural growing conditions, brand, and serving size. The USDA data represents typical values averaged across many samples. For precise dietary tracking, weigh your food and use a certified nutrition database.
Ham vs Lamb — Key Takeaway
Ham has 137 fewer calories per 100g than Lamb, making it the lighter choice for calorie-conscious diets. Ham is the stronger protein source with 21g per 100g versus 16.6g in Lamb, a difference of 4.4g that adds up meaningfully across multiple servings. Lamb contains more fat at 23.4g per 100g compared to 5.5g in Ham; however, the type of fat matters — unsaturated fats from whole foods like these are generally considered heart-healthy. Both foods have low fiber content (0g and 0g respectively), so neither stands out as a significant fiber source — pair either with high-fiber vegetables or legumes for a more complete meal. Overall, Ham edges ahead in this comparison, winning 5 of 10 nutritional categories. That said, both foods are nutritious whole-food options that can fit well into a balanced diet.
Track Your Nutrition
Make informed food choices with detailed nutrition data for every meal.
Compare More Foods