Bison vs Ham
· Source: USDA FoodData Central
Nutrition Comparison per 100g
Meat vs Meat
Side-by-Side Nutrition Facts
Macronutrient Breakdown
Bison
Ham
Nutrition Quick Facts (per 100g)
Bison
- Calories143 kcal
- Protein28.4g
- Total Fat2.4g
- Carbohydrates0g
- Dietary Fiber0g
- Sugar0g
- Vitamin C0mg
- Calcium13mg
- Iron3.4mg
- Potassium361mg
Ham
- Calories145 kcal
- Protein21g
- Total Fat5.5g
- Carbohydrates1.5g
- Dietary Fiber0g
- Sugar0g
- Vitamin C0mg
- Calcium7mg
- Iron0.7mg
- Potassium287mg
About This Data
Nutrition data is sourced from the USDA FoodData Central SR Legacy database, the authoritative reference for nutrient composition of foods sold and consumed in the United States. All values are per 100g of the raw food item unless otherwise noted.
Actual nutritional content may vary based on preparation method (raw vs. cooked, boiled vs. fried), agricultural growing conditions, brand, and serving size. The USDA data represents typical values averaged across many samples. For precise dietary tracking, weigh your food and use a certified nutrition database.
Bison vs Ham — Key Takeaway
Bison and Ham are similar in calories — 143 kcal vs 145 kcal per 100g — making either a comparable choice for calorie tracking. Bison is the stronger protein source with 28.4g per 100g versus 21g in Ham, a difference of 7.4g that adds up meaningfully across multiple servings. Ham contains more fat at 5.5g per 100g compared to 2.4g in Bison; however, the type of fat matters — unsaturated fats from whole foods like these are generally considered heart-healthy. Both foods have low fiber content (0g and 0g respectively), so neither stands out as a significant fiber source — pair either with high-fiber vegetables or legumes for a more complete meal. Bison provides 361mg of potassium per 100g — significantly more than Ham's 287mg — making it a better option for supporting healthy blood pressure and muscle function.
Track Your Nutrition
Make informed food choices with detailed nutrition data for every meal.
Compare More Foods