Lamb vs Ricotta
Nutrition Comparison per 100g
Lamb 4
vs 4 Ricotta
Meat vs Dairy & Eggs
Side-by-Side Nutrition Facts
| Nutrient | Lamb | Ricotta | Better |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 282kcal | 174kcal | Ricotta |
| Protein | 16.6g | 11.3g | Lamb |
| Total Fat | 23.4g | 13g | Ricotta |
| Carbohydrates | 0g | 3g | Ricotta |
| Fiber | 0g | 0g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0g | 0.3g | Lamb |
| Vitamin C | 0mg | 0mg | Tie |
| Calcium | 16mg | 207mg | Ricotta |
| Iron | 1.6mg | 0.4mg | Lamb |
| Potassium | 222mg | 105mg | Lamb |
Macronutrient Breakdown
Lamb
Protein: 16.6g Fat: 23.4g Carbs: 0g
Ricotta
Protein: 11.3g Fat: 13g Carbs: 3g
Data Source
Nutrition data sourced from the USDA FoodData Central SR Legacy database. All values are per 100g of the food item. Actual nutritional content may vary by preparation method, brand, and serving size.
Lamb vs Ricotta — Key Takeaway
Ricotta has 108 fewer calories per 100g than Lamb, making it the lighter option. For protein, Lamb leads with 16.6g per 100g.
Track Your Nutrition
Make informed food choices with detailed nutrition data for every meal.
Compare More Foods