Lamb vs Milk Chocolate
Nutrition Comparison per 100g
Lamb 4
vs 5 Milk Chocolate
Meat vs Sweets
Side-by-Side Nutrition Facts
| Nutrient | Lamb | Milk Chocolate | Better |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 282kcal | 535kcal | Lamb |
| Protein | 16.6g | 7.6g | Lamb |
| Total Fat | 23.4g | 29.7g | Lamb |
| Carbohydrates | 0g | 59.4g | Milk Chocolate |
| Fiber | 0g | 3.4g | Milk Chocolate |
| Sugar | 0g | 52g | Lamb |
| Vitamin C | 0mg | 0mg | Tie |
| Calcium | 16mg | 189mg | Milk Chocolate |
| Iron | 1.6mg | 2.4mg | Milk Chocolate |
| Potassium | 222mg | 372mg | Milk Chocolate |
Macronutrient Breakdown
Lamb
Protein: 16.6g Fat: 23.4g Carbs: 0g
Milk Chocolate
Protein: 7.6g Fat: 29.7g Carbs: 59.4g
Data Source
Nutrition data sourced from the USDA FoodData Central SR Legacy database. All values are per 100g of the food item. Actual nutritional content may vary by preparation method, brand, and serving size.
Lamb vs Milk Chocolate — Key Takeaway
Lamb has 253 fewer calories per 100g than Milk Chocolate, making it the lighter option. For protein, Lamb leads with 16.6g per 100g. Milk Chocolate is the better source of fiber at 3.4g per 100g.
Track Your Nutrition
Make informed food choices with detailed nutrition data for every meal.
Compare More Foods