Which is healthier, Kombucha or Milk (Skim)?

Neither is clearly better — they have different strengths. Kombucha has 13 calories and 0g protein per 100g, while Milk (Skim) has 34 calories and 3.4g protein.

How many calories are in Kombucha vs Milk (Skim)?

Kombucha contains 13 calories per 100g, while Milk (Skim) contains 34 calories per 100g.

Which has more protein, Kombucha or Milk (Skim)?

Milk (Skim) has more protein with 3.4g per 100g compared to 0g.

Kombucha vs Milk (Skim)

Nutrition Comparison per 100g

Kombucha 4

4 Milk (Skim)

Beverages vs Dairy & Eggs

Side-by-Side Nutrition Facts

Nutrient	Kombucha	Milk (Skim)	Better
Calories	13kcal	34kcal	Kombucha
Protein	0g	3.4g	Milk (Skim)
Total Fat	0g	0.1g	Kombucha
Carbohydrates	3g	5g	Milk (Skim)
Fiber	0g	0g	Tie
Sugar	2.5g	5g	Kombucha
Vitamin C	0mg	0mg	Tie
Calcium	0mg	122mg	Milk (Skim)
Iron	0.1mg	0mg	Kombucha
Potassium	14mg	156mg	Milk (Skim)

Macronutrient Breakdown

Kombucha

Protein: 0g Fat: 0g Carbs: 3g

Milk (Skim)

Protein: 3.4g Fat: 0.1g Carbs: 5g

Data Source

Nutrition data sourced from the USDA FoodData Central SR Legacy database. All values are per 100g of the food item. Actual nutritional content may vary by preparation method, brand, and serving size.