Which is healthier, Kombucha or Lamb?

Lamb wins in 5 out of 10 nutritional categories. Kombucha has 13 calories and 0g protein per 100g, while Lamb has 282 calories and 16.6g protein.

How many calories are in Kombucha vs Lamb?

Kombucha contains 13 calories per 100g, while Lamb contains 282 calories per 100g.

Which has more protein, Kombucha or Lamb?

Lamb has more protein with 16.6g per 100g compared to 0g.

Kombucha vs Lamb

Nutrition Comparison per 100g

Kombucha 3

5 Lamb

Beverages vs Meat

Side-by-Side Nutrition Facts

Nutrient	Kombucha	Lamb	Better
Calories	13kcal	282kcal	Kombucha
Protein	0g	16.6g	Lamb
Total Fat	0g	23.4g	Kombucha
Carbohydrates	3g	0g	Kombucha
Fiber	0g	0g	Tie
Sugar	2.5g	0g	Lamb
Vitamin C	0mg	0mg	Tie
Calcium	0mg	16mg	Lamb
Iron	0.1mg	1.6mg	Lamb
Potassium	14mg	222mg	Lamb

Macronutrient Breakdown

Kombucha

Protein: 0g Fat: 0g Carbs: 3g

Lamb

Protein: 16.6g Fat: 23.4g Carbs: 0g

Data Source

Nutrition data sourced from the USDA FoodData Central SR Legacy database. All values are per 100g of the food item. Actual nutritional content may vary by preparation method, brand, and serving size.

Kombucha vs Lamb — Key Takeaway

Kombucha has 269 fewer calories per 100g than Lamb, making it the lighter option. For protein, Lamb leads with 16.6g per 100g.

Track Your Nutrition

Make informed food choices with detailed nutrition data for every meal.

Compare More Foods