Falafel vs Ranch Dressing
Nutrition Comparison per 100g
Falafel 9
vs 0 Ranch Dressing
Legumes & Soy vs Condiments
Side-by-Side Nutrition Facts
| Nutrient | Falafel | Ranch Dressing | Better |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 333kcal | 462kcal | Falafel |
| Protein | 13.3g | 1.1g | Falafel |
| Total Fat | 17.8g | 48.5g | Falafel |
| Carbohydrates | 31.8g | 5.5g | Falafel |
| Fiber | 0g | 0g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0g | 2g | Falafel |
| Vitamin C | 3.4mg | 0mg | Falafel |
| Calcium | 54mg | 22mg | Falafel |
| Iron | 3.4mg | 0.1mg | Falafel |
| Potassium | 585mg | 44mg | Falafel |
Macronutrient Breakdown
Falafel
Protein: 13.3g Fat: 17.8g Carbs: 31.8g
Ranch Dressing
Protein: 1.1g Fat: 48.5g Carbs: 5.5g
Data Source
Nutrition data sourced from the USDA FoodData Central SR Legacy database. All values are per 100g of the food item. Actual nutritional content may vary by preparation method, brand, and serving size.
Falafel vs Ranch Dressing — Key Takeaway
Falafel has 129 fewer calories per 100g than Ranch Dressing, making it the lighter option. For protein, Falafel leads with 13.3g per 100g.
Track Your Nutrition
Make informed food choices with detailed nutrition data for every meal.
Compare More Foods