Falafel vs Kombucha
Nutrition Comparison per 100g
Falafel 7
vs 2 Kombucha
Legumes & Soy vs Beverages
Side-by-Side Nutrition Facts
| Nutrient | Falafel | Kombucha | Better |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 333kcal | 13kcal | Kombucha |
| Protein | 13.3g | 0g | Falafel |
| Total Fat | 17.8g | 0g | Kombucha |
| Carbohydrates | 31.8g | 3g | Falafel |
| Fiber | 0g | 0g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0g | 2.5g | Falafel |
| Vitamin C | 3.4mg | 0mg | Falafel |
| Calcium | 54mg | 0mg | Falafel |
| Iron | 3.4mg | 0.1mg | Falafel |
| Potassium | 585mg | 14mg | Falafel |
Macronutrient Breakdown
Falafel
Protein: 13.3g Fat: 17.8g Carbs: 31.8g
Kombucha
Protein: 0g Fat: 0g Carbs: 3g
Data Source
Nutrition data sourced from the USDA FoodData Central SR Legacy database. All values are per 100g of the food item. Actual nutritional content may vary by preparation method, brand, and serving size.
Falafel vs Kombucha — Key Takeaway
Kombucha has 320 fewer calories per 100g than Falafel, making it the lighter option. For protein, Falafel leads with 13.3g per 100g.
Track Your Nutrition
Make informed food choices with detailed nutrition data for every meal.
Compare More Foods