Dark Chocolate vs Lamb
Nutrition Comparison per 100g
Dark Chocolate 5
vs 4 Lamb
Sweets vs Meat
Side-by-Side Nutrition Facts
| Nutrient | Dark Chocolate | Lamb | Better |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 546kcal | 282kcal | Lamb |
| Protein | 4.9g | 16.6g | Lamb |
| Total Fat | 31.3g | 23.4g | Lamb |
| Carbohydrates | 59.4g | 0g | Dark Chocolate |
| Fiber | 7g | 0g | Dark Chocolate |
| Sugar | 48g | 0g | Lamb |
| Vitamin C | 0mg | 0mg | Tie |
| Calcium | 56mg | 16mg | Dark Chocolate |
| Iron | 8mg | 1.6mg | Dark Chocolate |
| Potassium | 559mg | 222mg | Dark Chocolate |
Macronutrient Breakdown
Dark Chocolate
Protein: 4.9g Fat: 31.3g Carbs: 59.4g
Lamb
Protein: 16.6g Fat: 23.4g Carbs: 0g
Data Source
Nutrition data sourced from the USDA FoodData Central SR Legacy database. All values are per 100g of the food item. Actual nutritional content may vary by preparation method, brand, and serving size.
Dark Chocolate vs Lamb — Key Takeaway
Lamb has 264 fewer calories per 100g than Dark Chocolate, making it the lighter option. For protein, Lamb leads with 16.6g per 100g. Dark Chocolate is the better source of fiber at 7g per 100g.
Track Your Nutrition
Make informed food choices with detailed nutrition data for every meal.
Compare More Foods