Cranberry vs Pork Chop
Nutrition Comparison per 100g
Cranberry 5
vs 5 Pork Chop
Fruits vs Meat
Side-by-Side Nutrition Facts
| Nutrient | Cranberry | Pork Chop | Better |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 46kcal | 231kcal | Cranberry |
| Protein | 0.4g | 25.7g | Pork Chop |
| Total Fat | 0.1g | 13.9g | Cranberry |
| Carbohydrates | 12.2g | 0g | Cranberry |
| Fiber | 4.6g | 0g | Cranberry |
| Sugar | 4g | 0g | Pork Chop |
| Vitamin C | 13.3mg | 0.6mg | Cranberry |
| Calcium | 8mg | 19mg | Pork Chop |
| Iron | 0.3mg | 0.9mg | Pork Chop |
| Potassium | 85mg | 362mg | Pork Chop |
Macronutrient Breakdown
Cranberry
Protein: 0.4g Fat: 0.1g Carbs: 12.2g
Pork Chop
Protein: 25.7g Fat: 13.9g Carbs: 0g
Data Source
Nutrition data sourced from the USDA FoodData Central SR Legacy database. All values are per 100g of the food item. Actual nutritional content may vary by preparation method, brand, and serving size.
Cranberry vs Pork Chop — Key Takeaway
Cranberry has 185 fewer calories per 100g than Pork Chop, making it the lighter option. For protein, Pork Chop leads with 25.7g per 100g. Cranberry is the better source of fiber at 4.6g per 100g. Cranberry provides 13.3mg of vitamin C.
Track Your Nutrition
Make informed food choices with detailed nutrition data for every meal.
Compare More Foods