Chili con Carne vs Ranch Dressing
Nutrition Comparison per 100g
Chili con Carne 9
vs 0 Ranch Dressing
Fast Food vs Condiments
Side-by-Side Nutrition Facts
| Nutrient | Chili con Carne | Ranch Dressing | Better |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 123kcal | 462kcal | Chili con Carne |
| Protein | 7.5g | 1.1g | Chili con Carne |
| Total Fat | 5g | 48.5g | Chili con Carne |
| Carbohydrates | 11.5g | 5.5g | Chili con Carne |
| Fiber | 3g | 0g | Chili con Carne |
| Sugar | 2g | 2g | Tie |
| Vitamin C | 3mg | 0mg | Chili con Carne |
| Calcium | 35mg | 22mg | Chili con Carne |
| Iron | 1.5mg | 0.1mg | Chili con Carne |
| Potassium | 280mg | 44mg | Chili con Carne |
Macronutrient Breakdown
Chili con Carne
Protein: 7.5g Fat: 5g Carbs: 11.5g
Ranch Dressing
Protein: 1.1g Fat: 48.5g Carbs: 5.5g
Data Source
Nutrition data sourced from the USDA FoodData Central SR Legacy database. All values are per 100g of the food item. Actual nutritional content may vary by preparation method, brand, and serving size.
Chili con Carne vs Ranch Dressing — Key Takeaway
Chili con Carne has 339 fewer calories per 100g than Ranch Dressing, making it the lighter option. For protein, Chili con Carne leads with 7.5g per 100g.
Track Your Nutrition
Make informed food choices with detailed nutrition data for every meal.
Compare More Foods