Chili con Carne vs Plum
Nutrition Comparison per 100g
Chili con Carne 7
vs 3 Plum
Fast Food vs Fruits
Side-by-Side Nutrition Facts
| Nutrient | Chili con Carne | Plum | Better |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 123kcal | 46kcal | Plum |
| Protein | 7.5g | 0.7g | Chili con Carne |
| Total Fat | 5g | 0.3g | Plum |
| Carbohydrates | 11.5g | 11.4g | Chili con Carne |
| Fiber | 3g | 1.4g | Chili con Carne |
| Sugar | 2g | 9.9g | Chili con Carne |
| Vitamin C | 3mg | 9.5mg | Plum |
| Calcium | 35mg | 6mg | Chili con Carne |
| Iron | 1.5mg | 0.2mg | Chili con Carne |
| Potassium | 280mg | 157mg | Chili con Carne |
Macronutrient Breakdown
Chili con Carne
Protein: 7.5g Fat: 5g Carbs: 11.5g
Plum
Protein: 0.7g Fat: 0.3g Carbs: 11.4g
Data Source
Nutrition data sourced from the USDA FoodData Central SR Legacy database. All values are per 100g of the food item. Actual nutritional content may vary by preparation method, brand, and serving size.
Chili con Carne vs Plum — Key Takeaway
Plum has 77 fewer calories per 100g than Chili con Carne, making it the lighter option. For protein, Chili con Carne leads with 7.5g per 100g.
Track Your Nutrition
Make informed food choices with detailed nutrition data for every meal.
Compare More Foods