Chili con Carne vs Mango
Nutrition Comparison per 100g
Chili con Carne 6
vs 4 Mango
Fast Food vs Fruits
Side-by-Side Nutrition Facts
| Nutrient | Chili con Carne | Mango | Better |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 123kcal | 60kcal | Mango |
| Protein | 7.5g | 0.8g | Chili con Carne |
| Total Fat | 5g | 0.4g | Mango |
| Carbohydrates | 11.5g | 15g | Mango |
| Fiber | 3g | 1.6g | Chili con Carne |
| Sugar | 2g | 13.7g | Chili con Carne |
| Vitamin C | 3mg | 36.4mg | Mango |
| Calcium | 35mg | 11mg | Chili con Carne |
| Iron | 1.5mg | 0.2mg | Chili con Carne |
| Potassium | 280mg | 168mg | Chili con Carne |
Macronutrient Breakdown
Chili con Carne
Protein: 7.5g Fat: 5g Carbs: 11.5g
Mango
Protein: 0.8g Fat: 0.4g Carbs: 15g
Data Source
Nutrition data sourced from the USDA FoodData Central SR Legacy database. All values are per 100g of the food item. Actual nutritional content may vary by preparation method, brand, and serving size.
Chili con Carne vs Mango — Key Takeaway
Mango has 63 fewer calories per 100g than Chili con Carne, making it the lighter option. For protein, Chili con Carne leads with 7.5g per 100g. Mango provides 36.4mg of vitamin C.
Track Your Nutrition
Make informed food choices with detailed nutrition data for every meal.
Compare More Foods