Chili con Carne vs Lamb
Nutrition Comparison per 100g
Chili con Carne 7
vs 3 Lamb
Fast Food vs Meat
Side-by-Side Nutrition Facts
| Nutrient | Chili con Carne | Lamb | Better |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 123kcal | 282kcal | Chili con Carne |
| Protein | 7.5g | 16.6g | Lamb |
| Total Fat | 5g | 23.4g | Chili con Carne |
| Carbohydrates | 11.5g | 0g | Chili con Carne |
| Fiber | 3g | 0g | Chili con Carne |
| Sugar | 2g | 0g | Lamb |
| Vitamin C | 3mg | 0mg | Chili con Carne |
| Calcium | 35mg | 16mg | Chili con Carne |
| Iron | 1.5mg | 1.6mg | Lamb |
| Potassium | 280mg | 222mg | Chili con Carne |
Macronutrient Breakdown
Chili con Carne
Protein: 7.5g Fat: 5g Carbs: 11.5g
Lamb
Protein: 16.6g Fat: 23.4g Carbs: 0g
Data Source
Nutrition data sourced from the USDA FoodData Central SR Legacy database. All values are per 100g of the food item. Actual nutritional content may vary by preparation method, brand, and serving size.
Chili con Carne vs Lamb — Key Takeaway
Chili con Carne has 159 fewer calories per 100g than Lamb, making it the lighter option. For protein, Lamb leads with 16.6g per 100g.
Track Your Nutrition
Make informed food choices with detailed nutrition data for every meal.
Compare More Foods