Chili con Carne vs Kombucha
Nutrition Comparison per 100g
Chili con Carne 8
vs 2 Kombucha
Fast Food vs Beverages
Side-by-Side Nutrition Facts
| Nutrient | Chili con Carne | Kombucha | Better |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 123kcal | 13kcal | Kombucha |
| Protein | 7.5g | 0g | Chili con Carne |
| Total Fat | 5g | 0g | Kombucha |
| Carbohydrates | 11.5g | 3g | Chili con Carne |
| Fiber | 3g | 0g | Chili con Carne |
| Sugar | 2g | 2.5g | Chili con Carne |
| Vitamin C | 3mg | 0mg | Chili con Carne |
| Calcium | 35mg | 0mg | Chili con Carne |
| Iron | 1.5mg | 0.1mg | Chili con Carne |
| Potassium | 280mg | 14mg | Chili con Carne |
Macronutrient Breakdown
Chili con Carne
Protein: 7.5g Fat: 5g Carbs: 11.5g
Kombucha
Protein: 0g Fat: 0g Carbs: 3g
Data Source
Nutrition data sourced from the USDA FoodData Central SR Legacy database. All values are per 100g of the food item. Actual nutritional content may vary by preparation method, brand, and serving size.
Chili con Carne vs Kombucha — Key Takeaway
Kombucha has 110 fewer calories per 100g than Chili con Carne, making it the lighter option. For protein, Chili con Carne leads with 7.5g per 100g.
Track Your Nutrition
Make informed food choices with detailed nutrition data for every meal.
Compare More Foods