Chili con Carne vs Cranberry
Nutrition Comparison per 100g
Chili con Carne 5
vs 5 Cranberry
Fast Food vs Fruits
Side-by-Side Nutrition Facts
| Nutrient | Chili con Carne | Cranberry | Better |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 123kcal | 46kcal | Cranberry |
| Protein | 7.5g | 0.4g | Chili con Carne |
| Total Fat | 5g | 0.1g | Cranberry |
| Carbohydrates | 11.5g | 12.2g | Cranberry |
| Fiber | 3g | 4.6g | Cranberry |
| Sugar | 2g | 4g | Chili con Carne |
| Vitamin C | 3mg | 13.3mg | Cranberry |
| Calcium | 35mg | 8mg | Chili con Carne |
| Iron | 1.5mg | 0.3mg | Chili con Carne |
| Potassium | 280mg | 85mg | Chili con Carne |
Macronutrient Breakdown
Chili con Carne
Protein: 7.5g Fat: 5g Carbs: 11.5g
Cranberry
Protein: 0.4g Fat: 0.1g Carbs: 12.2g
Data Source
Nutrition data sourced from the USDA FoodData Central SR Legacy database. All values are per 100g of the food item. Actual nutritional content may vary by preparation method, brand, and serving size.
Chili con Carne vs Cranberry — Key Takeaway
Cranberry has 77 fewer calories per 100g than Chili con Carne, making it the lighter option. For protein, Chili con Carne leads with 7.5g per 100g. Cranberry is the better source of fiber at 4.6g per 100g. Cranberry provides 13.3mg of vitamin C.
Track Your Nutrition
Make informed food choices with detailed nutrition data for every meal.
Compare More Foods