Chili con Carne vs Clam
Nutrition Comparison per 100g
Chili con Carne 3
vs 7 Clam
Fast Food vs Seafood
Side-by-Side Nutrition Facts
| Nutrient | Chili con Carne | Clam | Better |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 123kcal | 148kcal | Chili con Carne |
| Protein | 7.5g | 25.6g | Clam |
| Total Fat | 5g | 2g | Clam |
| Carbohydrates | 11.5g | 5.1g | Chili con Carne |
| Fiber | 3g | 0g | Chili con Carne |
| Sugar | 2g | 0g | Clam |
| Vitamin C | 3mg | 22.1mg | Clam |
| Calcium | 35mg | 92mg | Clam |
| Iron | 1.5mg | 28mg | Clam |
| Potassium | 280mg | 628mg | Clam |
Macronutrient Breakdown
Chili con Carne
Protein: 7.5g Fat: 5g Carbs: 11.5g
Clam
Protein: 25.6g Fat: 2g Carbs: 5.1g
Data Source
Nutrition data sourced from the USDA FoodData Central SR Legacy database. All values are per 100g of the food item. Actual nutritional content may vary by preparation method, brand, and serving size.
Chili con Carne vs Clam — Key Takeaway
For protein, Clam leads with 25.6g per 100g. Clam provides 22.1mg of vitamin C.
Track Your Nutrition
Make informed food choices with detailed nutrition data for every meal.
Compare More Foods